QuantCapitol. Congressional Trading Intelligence

Updated 2026-11-05 08:06 UTC · Public disclosure record

99AVG SCORE

Shelley Capito

Senate Republican WV
Senate Committee on AppropriationsSenate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationSenate Committee on Environment and Public WorksSenate Committee on Rules and Administration
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related AgenciesDepartment of DefenseDepartment of Homeland SecurityDepartment of Interior, Environment, and Related AgenciesDepartments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related AgenciesTransportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related AgenciesAviation, Space, and InnovationTelecommunications and MediaConsumer Protection, Technology, and Data PrivacySurface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines, and SafetyChemical Safety, Waste Management, Environmental Justice, and Regulatory OversightClean Air, Climate, and Nuclear Innovation and SafetyFisheries, Water, and WildlifeTransportation and Infrastructure

Shelley Capito has disclosed 6 stock transactions — 0 buys, 5 sells and 1 other (exchanges/other), each ranked by how much scrutiny it deserves and linked to its original Senate filing. A transparency record.

⚑
4 potential conflicts of interest. Capito sits on committee(s) overseeing Defense, Technology, Telecommunications, Transportation, and made 4 trades in those sectors (marked ⚑ below). This is a transparency signal, not an allegation of wrongdoing — such trades are often entirely legitimate.
6
Total trades
0
Buy
5
Sell
1
Other (exchange)
15
Avg. disclosure delay (days)

Track record Congressional Trading Performance

Two figures per horizon, both hypothetical and not investment advice: Member's own — what the trade returned if you'd bought when Capito did (not public yet, so not replicable); and If you'd followed — buying only after the disclosure went public, which is what a follower could actually do. The gap between them is the cost of the disclosure lag.

1 month
insufficient data
0 of 0 priced
3 months
insufficient data
0 of 0 priced
6 months
insufficient data
0 of 0 priced
1 year
insufficient data
0 of 0 priced
3 years
insufficient data
0 of 0 priced

The count falls at longer horizons because recent trades haven't completed the full window yet — a return that hasn't happened is never estimated (no look-ahead). Only buys with usable price data are counted.

Where they trade Favorite Sectors

Distribution of this politician's trades across sectors (of trades with a known sector — bonds and funds are excluded).

Technology
4 (67%)
Food & Agriculture
1 (17%)
Finance
1 (17%)

Traded the same stocks, same time Co-Investors in Congress

Other members who traded the same tickers within 30 days of Capito's trades in them. A high overlap can reflect shared information, shared advisors, or simply popular stocks — it is not evidence of coordination.

PoliticianOverlapping tradesShared tickers
Richard Dean McCormick 3 AAPL, CSCO, MSFT
David Taylor 3 MSFT
Rohit Khanna 3 C, MSFT
Michael Rulli 2 AAPL, MSFT
Sheldon Whitehouse 2 AAPL
Josh Gottheimer 2 MSFT
Lloyd Doggett 1 KO
Nancy Pelosi 1 INTC
Cleo Fields 1 AAPL
John McGuire 1 AAPL
Scott Franklin 1 AAPL
Ed Case 1 AAPL

Corporate insiders · SEC Form 4 Overlap with Insiders

On the trades where corporate insiders were also active, how often did Shelley Capito move the same way as the company's own officers and directors (within 60 days)? Co-occurrence only — context from public Form 4 filings, never proof of coordination, and tested honestly for whether it means anything.

80%
of checkable trades converged
avg 20% across all members
4
converged (of 5 checkable)
1
diverged

Shelley Capito's convergence rate of 80% is higher than the 20% average across all members. "Checkable" = trades on tickers where insiders were also trading, so convergence could even be measured.

TickerDateTradeInsider convergence
KO 2026-07-21 SELL ◆ moderate · 7 insiders

Descriptive only — insider convergence is context from public SEC Form 4 filings, never proof of coordination or wrongdoing, and not investment advice.

6 trades Recent Transactions

Marker key: ⚑ potential conflict (a committee Capito sits on oversees that sector) · ◆ corporate-insider overlap from SEC Form 4 (convergence/divergence — context, not a signal) · % of NW trade size vs estimated net worth, 🔥 marking high/extreme conviction · OCR recovered from a scanned filing (verify against source) · ×N filings the same trade disclosed more than once (shown once). None is an allegation of wrongdoing.

TickerCompanyTypeDateFiledLagPrice move
in that
window
AmountScoreSource
⚑ CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. SELL ◆ insider convergence 2026-07-21 2026-08-04 14 days +8.5% $1K–$15K 99.9 ↗ eFD
KO Coca Cola Co. SELL ◆ insider convergence · moderate 2026-07-21 2026-08-04 14 days +5.6% $1K–$15K 97.5 ↗ eFD
⚑ INTC Intel Corp. SELL ◆ insider divergence · strong 2026-07-21 2026-08-04 14 days -4.4% $1K–$15K 99.9 ↗ eFD
⚑ AAPL Apple Inc. SELL ◆ insider convergence 2026-07-21 2026-08-04 14 days -5.6% $1K–$15K 100.0 ↗ eFD
⚑ MSFT Microsoft Corp. SELL ◆ insider convergence 2026-07-21 2026-08-04 14 days +23.9% $15K–$50K 100.0 ↗ eFD
C Citigroup Inc. OTHER 2026-06-16 2026-07-06 20 days +0.6% $1K–$15K 96.3 ↗ eFD

FAQ Common questions

How many stock trades has Shelley Capito disclosed?

6 disclosed stock transactions — 0 buys and 5 sells — all from official Senate financial disclosures.

Is this insider trading?

No. QuantCapitol surfaces the timing and context of publicly disclosed trades for transparency. A trade near related legislation is a coincidence we flag — never an accusation of wrongdoing.

Where does this data come from?

Official US House Clerk and Senate electronic financial disclosures. Every trade links back to its original filing so you can verify it yourself.

About this data. Sourced from official House Clerk and Senate eFD financial disclosures (Senate via a maintained community mirror — see project documentation). Transaction amounts are reported as ranges, not exact figures. Interest scores, consensus labels, and backtested performance are proprietary analytical calculations based on public data and are not investment advice. Backtested performance is a hypothetical simulation, not actual portfolio performance.