Victoria Spartz

Victoria Spartz has disclosed 18 stock transactions — 15 buys, 3 sells, each ranked by how much scrutiny it deserves and linked to its original House filing. A transparency record.

Track record Congressional Trading Performance

Two figures per horizon, both hypothetical and not investment advice: Member's own — what the trade returned if you'd bought when Spartz did (not public yet, so not replicable); and If you'd followed — buying only after the disclosure went public, which is what a follower could actually do. The gap between them is the cost of the disclosure lag.

The count falls at longer horizons because recent trades haven't completed the full window yet — a return that hasn't happened is never estimated (no look-ahead). Only buys with usable price data are counted.

Round-trip watch Open positions

Stocks Spartz disclosed buying and has not disclosed selling, versus their entry (the most recent disclosed buy). "Open" means no disclosed sale — never "still holds" — and the % is unrealised. Not investment advice.

Price as of 2026-11-02. Counted open while disclosed buys outnumber disclosed sells; tracks the price, not exact position size (amounts are ranges).

Where they trade Favorite Sectors

Distribution of this politician's trades across sectors (of trades with a known sector — bonds and funds are excluded).

Traded the same stocks, same time Co-Investors in Congress

Other members who traded the same tickers within 30 days of Spartz's trades in them. A high overlap can reflect shared information, shared advisors, or simply popular stocks — it is not evidence of coordination.

Corporate insiders · SEC Form 4 Overlap with Insiders

On the trades where corporate insiders were also active, how often did Victoria Spartz move the same way as the company's own officers and directors (within 60 days)? Co-occurrence only — context from public Form 4 filings, never proof of coordination, and tested honestly for whether it means anything.

Victoria Spartz's convergence rate of 44% is higher than the 20% average across all members. "Checkable" = trades on tickers where insiders were also trading, so convergence could even be measured.

Descriptive only — insider convergence is context from public SEC Form 4 filings, never proof of coordination or wrongdoing, and not investment advice.

16 trades Recent Transactions

Marker key: ⚑ potential conflict (a committee Spartz sits on oversees that sector) · ◆ corporate-insider overlap from SEC Form 4 (convergence/divergence — context, not a signal) · % of NW trade size vs estimated net worth, 🔥 marking high/extreme conviction · OCR recovered from a scanned filing (verify against source) · ×N filings the same trade disclosed more than once (shown once). None is an allegation of wrongdoing.

A trade can appear in more than one filing (e.g. a periodic transaction report and a later annual disclosure). Those are shown once here — marked ×N filings, with a link to each — so the table reflects distinct trades, while the 18 total above counts every disclosed line.