Simply Good Foods Co.

Congress has disclosed 3 buys and 0 sells of SMPL (Simply Good Foods Co.) in official financial disclosures, each linked to its original filing. A transparency record — not investment advice.

Activity Congressional Activity

Round-trip watch Still on the books

Members who disclosed buying SMPL and have not disclosed selling, versus their own entry (the most recent disclosed buy). "Open" means no disclosed sale — never "still holds" — and the % is unrealised, on paper. Not investment advice.

Price as of 2026-11-02. Counted open while disclosed buys outnumber disclosed sells; tracks the price, not exact position size (amounts are ranges).

Fundamentals · FY2026 Valuation

Standard valuation multiples from SEC-reported GAAP financials (trailing twelve months), each compared to the median for Food & Agriculture. We use reported GAAP, not forward or adjusted earnings, so our figures can sit higher than sites that do — especially for companies with falling profit. Relative context — not a target price or investment advice.

Legislation Related Legislation

Recent bills in this stock's sector (Food & Agriculture). Sector-level context from Congress.gov — a bill names a policy area, not this company specifically.

3 trades Recent Congressional Trades

Two things to watch per trade: the disclosure lag (how many days passed before the trade was made public) and the price move in that window (how the stock moved during those non-public days). A sell followed by a price drop, or a buy followed by a rise, means well-timed trading — visible here in the open. Note: the Score measures how notable a trade is, not whether it made money — the price move is shown for context and isn't part of it.

Corporate insiders · SEC Form 4 Insider Activity

What the company's own officers and directors did in SMPL — open-market purchases and sales from SEC Form 4 filings (option exercises, grants and tax withholding are excluded). This is context for the congressional activity above, never a buy/sell signal, and the two datasets are kept separate on purpose. Does convergence mean anything? →

Of the congressional trades in SMPL, 2 coincided with corporate insiders moving the same way within 60 days, and 0 with insiders moving the opposite way. This is co-occurrence only — whether it carries any edge is tested honestly on the convergence page.

Combined timeline — Congress & insiders

Both sets of trades on one timeline, newest first, so you can see when they lined up. Congress vs ◆ insider.